Study: Viewers of Fox News Less Informed of World Events Than Those Who Don’t Watch Any News
Reply
By Madison S. Hughes (11.22.2011)
I take offense to it for three reasons:
1. It implies that I deign the same irrational superstitious belief.
2. The audacity of it being so freely used reminds one of how it has been allowed to become a meme of the Christian White Privilege that so permeates our culture.
3. The passivity of those that recognize such, but somehow feel it is not worthy of a stance for their convictions.
I always respond with:
Don’t assume I share your delusions.
Have a Reasoned Day,
MadisonThe rhetorical question is, why, to some, would my response come-off as sounding bombastic, yet somehow it is considered taboo to criticize the sender’s complimentary closing? The answer may be found in number two above.