Share this:
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
I’m still not sure what the “true core” of the Jesus myth is because it had, I would argue, several critical points where its trajectory was enhanced, the most important being Constantine’s conversion and the subsequent rendering of this Jewish prophet or rabbi as divine and worthy of being worshiped as the state religion.
I am inclined to believe that there was a Jewish apocalyptic prophet that had gathered a band of brothers together to roam the Galilean countryside and might well have met his demise for some offense against the Roman state, not Judaism. I think one of the best points to be made for Jesus’ historicity is in Paul’s Letter to Galatians when he talks of going to Jerusalem to meet with Jesus’ brother James and the former disciples of Jesus. It is clear from this letter that the little band remaining in Jerusalem were more concerned about poverty and helping the poor than they were in starting a new religion.