New Statesman Preview: “The tyranny of the discontinuous mind” by Richard Dawkins

In “The tyranny of the discontinuous mind”, Dawkins wonders why we cling to absolutes of yes and no, black and white, rich and poor; pretending not to see the millions of grey areas in life. These absolutes, he argues, distort reality:

Dawkins goes on to consider a variety of these absolutes — where a blindness to intermediates may constrict or condemn us — beginning with the arguments proposed by anti-abortionists:

There are those who cannot distinguish a 16-cell embryo from a baby. They call abortion murder and feel righteously justified in committing real murder against a doctor – a thinking, feeling, sentient adult, with a loving family to mourn him . . .

It is amusing to tease such absolutists by confronting them with a pair of identical twins (they split after fertilisation, of course) and asking which twin got the soul, which twin is the non-person, the zombie. A puerile taunt? Maybe. But it hits home because the belief that it destroys is puerile, and ignorant.

Read more . . .

Posted by New Statesman – 19 December 2011 17:47

2 thoughts on “New Statesman Preview: “The tyranny of the discontinuous mind” by Richard Dawkins

    • Graham,

      I look forward to reading/listening to the illogical contortions of the literal and limited mindset the anti-choice absolutists will certainly put themselves through in their futile attempt to answer “which twin got the soul?”

      In Reason,
      Madison

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.