[More Police Brutality] in Oakland: 400 Arrests, Tear Gas, Flash-Bang Grenades

Downtown Oakland turned ugly once again on Saturday, as Occupy activists attempting to squat in a long-abandoned city building were met by lines of heavily-armored riot police. . .

It was, once again, a tale of two protests. Accounts in the corporate media relied primarily on police statements to paint protesters as wild animals running amok in the city, while those following the day’s events via a small group of “citizen-journalists” broadcasting raw, unedited footage from their cell-phones and flip-cams got a wildly divergent view of exactly how things escalated. . .

Police declared the protest an unlawful assembly, and soon afterward, a series of explosions could be heard on the livestream as police deployed either teargas canisters or “flash-bang” grenades to disperse the crowd. This appears to be a violation of the Oakland Police Department’s (OPD) own crowd-control guidelines . . . The guidelines state that less-lethal munitions “may never be used indiscriminately against a crowd or group of persons, even if some members of the crowd or group are violent or disruptive.”

. . . Protesters, including peaceful protesters, weren’t given an opportunity to disperse. OPD’s crowd control manual states that an order to disperse, “shall also specify adequate egress or escape routes. Whenever possible, a minimum of two escape/egress routes shall be identified and announced.”

. . . While the main body of protesters were being “herded” by OPD and eventually kettled at 23rd street, a smaller group broke into City Hall, where “they burned flags, broke an electrical box and damaged several art structures,” according to Oakland Mayor Jean Quan speaking at a press conference. Quan, blaming a small “very radical, violent” splinter group for the mayhem, called on the Occupy movement to “stop using Oakland as its playground.”

. . . But Michael Davis, a visitor from Occupy Cincinnati, told the Associated Press that a day of action which began peacefully escalated when police began using “flash bangs, tear gas, smoke grenades and bean bags,” in apparent violation of OPD policy.

The chronology is important to get right. By definition, protesters feel angry and aggrieved, and when force is applied indiscriminately on a crowd – and not directed at a handful of people seeking confrontation – it ratchets up the tension to a point where more confrontations become almost inevitable.

Read more . . .  

Quote: Saul Alinsky

Saul David Alinsky, Ph.B. (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972)
American Community Organizer, and Writer

In this world irrationality clings to man like his shadow . . . a world of religious institutions that have, in the main, come to support and justify the status quo so that today religion is materially solvent and spiritually bankrupt. We live with a Judaeo-Christian ethic that has not only accommodated itself to but justified slavery, war, and every other ugly human exploitation of whichever status quo happened to prevail.

Why The [Anti-Choice] Position is Spurious at Best

If someone loves life, I would imagine that person might have a profound interest in biology or some other form of natural science.  I mean, if you are truly fascinated and awe-struck by living things, then surely you should be enthralled by the prospect of studying the science of living things. . .

I can’t remember the last time I met someone who professed to be pro-life who was not an avid supporter of the war in Iraq.  How can someone who claims to be so bothered by the termination of potential babies be so callous and unaffected by wars that kill so many innocent people ?

. . . Maybe the most blatant incongruity, however, is the position on capital punishment so often held by [anti-choice] advocates.  How anyone can be so deluded to believe that s/he loves life and out of the other side of her/his mouth support the killing of people is beyond my ability to comprehend.

So, why then do [reactionaries] so adamantly profess to love life and maintain their [anti-choice] position?

Read more . . .