h/t: Anti-Theists. Pro Active Atheists. Opposing Religious Harm.
Share this:
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
An interesting argument by the godmother of American atheism but it’s accuracy depends on how you’re using ‘negation.’ I’m not a technical logician but it would seem that atheism (not theism) would be a negation of the proposition of theism. The Greek “a” in atheism is, if I understand correctly, better translated as “without”; So, I operate without a theistic belief, just as an (a)gnostic operates without knowledge of whether deities exist or not. Further, atheism does not, in itself, affirm anything; Secular humanism does.