[…]
. . . [T]he right to marry, . . . is a secular legal issue. Even if the state were to recognize same-sex marriages, churches, mosques or synagogues or other places of worship would not be required to hold wedding ceremonies within them or sanction such marriages because the no legal standing is attributed to such ceremonies or sanctions. Where is the attack on liberty?
[…]
. . . [T]he banner of ‘religious liberty’ is effectively more akin to the ‘right to discriminate.’ For the state to treat organized religious groups differently than it does other organizations implies special rights for these groups to behave differently than others. But this requires such religious groups to determine who is in the “in’ group, and who is in the ‘out’ group, and because religious doctrine guides moral behavior, it provides an opportunity for members of the group to condemn the behavior of those not in the group.
[…]
. . . [W]hen organized religious groups gain power of any form, power over the state, power over women, or power over children, the results inevitably lead to restrictions on liberty based on discrimination [bigotry].
Related articles
Always Question Authority
One of the beginnings of human emancipation is the ability to laugh at authority. ~ Hitchens
Always Question Authority 
Pingback: Reactions to Terrorism | lgalfonso
You can’t make a person’s thoughts illegal – you can’t fine a person or send him to jail for thinking that some races are beneath others or that they’d like to have sex with children. You can only legislate activity. We can’t stop people for thinking bigoted thoughts – that will take long-term education. We can, however, stop discriminatory practices. If churches want to say that homosexuality is a sin – it’s their right to do so. However, we can certainly decide if they are guilty of ‘hate speech’ as Rev. Worley certainly was, and we can fine them for discriminatory practices.