‘Fertility gap’ Helps Explain Political Divide

Republican House members overwhelmingly come from districts that have high percentages of married people and lots of children. . .

Many Democrats represent areas that have many single people and relatively few children. Democratic districts that have large numbers of children tend to be predominantly Hispanic or, to a lesser extent, African-American.

This “fertility gap” is crucial to understanding the differences between liberals and conservatives, says Arthur Brooks, a professor of public administration at Syracuse University. These childbearing patterns shape divisions over issues such as welfare, education and child tax credits, he says.

Read more . . .

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

There’s no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy. . . Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice.

Controversy ahead

Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions.

Brains and bias

As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between these two variables was political: When researchers included social conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of the link between brains and bias.

A study of averages

[T]here is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the complexity of the world.

“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”

Simple viewpoints

Prejudice is of particular interest because understanding the roots of racism and bias could help eliminate them, Hodson said. For example, he said, many anti-prejudice programs encourage participants to see things from another group’s point of view. That mental exercise may be too taxing for people of low IQ.

Read more . . .

Why Evangelicals Don’t Care When Rich White Conservatives Defile Marriage

[F]or the Republican base, “family values” don’t actually matter, but are just a gloss painted over what really motivates them: reactionary rage.

The sexual double standard is the most obvious way the us vs. them mentality works. There’s nothing the modern American conservative loves more than to decry our country’s supposedly declining sexual morals.

Sex is a weapon being used against all those classes of Americans they don’t like: non-white people, gays, non-Christians, liberals, Democrats, people who have to work for a living, poor people, Democratic politicians.  

Conservatives seem sick and tired of paying lip service to equality and family values, and instead are just enjoying the ride of cheering for the screw-you-I-got-mine guy.

Read more . . .

Quote: Fidel Castro

Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz, (born August 13, 1926)
Cuban Revolutionary, Prime Minister of Cuba 1959 – 1976,
President of Cuba 1976 – 2008

The selection of a  Republican candidate for the presidency of this globalized and expansive empire is – and I mean this seriously – the greatest competition of idiocy and ignorance that has ever been.

Sunday Morning Talk Shows Featured Twice As Many [Reactionary Obstructionists] As Democrats Last Year

In 2009 and 2010, [Reactionary Obstructionists] Members held a small advantage over Democratic Members in appearances on these programs, getting 52 percent of the invites in both years. In both years, CBS had more Democrats as guests than [Reactionary Obstructionists] by a narrow margin; in the same period, Fox News had more [Reactionary Obstructionists] guests by a wider margin. [Shocking I say! Who’da thunk it?]

But in 2011, the [White-wing] lawmakers captured 64 percent of the Congressional appearances on the five shows that Roll Call tracks, and every network featured more [Reactionary Obstructionists] lawmakers than Democrats. . .

The finding also undercuts the pervasive [White-wing] myth about the media possessing a liberal bias.

Read more . . .