Category Archives: Empathy

Why Does [Bigot] Tony Perkins Even Bother Going on TV…? (VIDEOS)

Posted on by
Reply

Repost from: Friendly Atheist

Tony Perkins, the head Christian at the Family Research Council, made news this week when he appeared on Piers Morgan‘s show and said this incredibly stupid thing:

Morgan: You have five kids, right?

Perkins: Yes, I do.

Morgan: What would you do if one of them came home and said, dad, I’m gay?

Perkins: Well, we would have a conversation about it. I doubt that would happen with my children, as we are teaching them the right ways that they are to interact as human beings.

In other words, his kids wouldn’t turn out gay because he raised them “right.”

Chris Matthews invited Perkins on Hardball to elaborate on the comment… and, for some reason, Perkins accepted. Barney Frank was there, too, and both he and Matthews went off on Perkins for 15 glorious minutes:

Read more, and watch Barney Frank school Tony Perkins video here . . .

[…]

To add insult to injury, Lawrence O’Donnell took Perkins to task for suggesting there has only been one definition of marriage throughout mankind’s 5,000-year history (wait, what?):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQWxWk1wTAs&feature=player_embedded

Nuns on the Run: Why is the Vatican cracking down on dissident American nuns?

Posted on by
1

Nuns aren’t what they used to be. Go to the website of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious [LCWR], an umbrella organisation that represents around 80 per cent of American convents and religious sisterhoods, and there isn’t a wimple or a rosary in sight. Instead you’ll find a group of women who could be members of the WI [Women’s Institute]: greying, wearing sensible sweaters, full of purpose.

Probe further and you may detect a whiff of New Agery along with the calls to social activism. The organisation hosts conferences with titles like “Women of spirit: creating in chaos”, “Embracing the dream” and “Religious life on the edge of tomorrow”. “We welcome new ideas and new ways of living religious life into the future,” proclaims the LCWR mission statement.

A section entitled “Resolutions to Action” gives some insight into where they think their priorities lie. The latest is entitled “We are the 99 per cent — the Occupy Movement”. The one before that proclaims “Economic Justice Advocacy Critically Needed.” There are calls to reduce the world’s carbon footprint and to eliminate global hunger. One is highly critical of WalMart. There’s a resolution calling for an end to capital punishment in the USA , but you look in vain for the kind of campaigns most closely associated with organised Catholicism; against abortion, contraception or gay marriage.

While no-one would claim that campaigns against global poverty are contrary to Catholic teaching — Pope Benedict’s major encyclical Caritas in Veritate was after all devoted to the subject — the LCWR’s emphasis stands in stark contrast to that of the male church leadership in the United States, currently waging war on the Obama administration’s contraception mandate in the name of religious freedom.

Read more . . .

Aphorism: On Christian Charity

Posted on by
4

By Madison S. Hughes (05.01.2012)

Churches in general and the Catholic Church in particular, are nothing more than organized tribal cults. They give to their respective tribes, as would any primal tribe; however, these modern-day mendicants mooch off of their secular brethren through tax-exemptions and other Christian privileges purposefully to give back to their primal tribes. They give not out of a sense of compassion to their fellow human beings, but out of a sense of community to their fellow limited and literal-minded tribe members.

Highly Religious People Are Less Motivated by Compassion Than Are Non-Believers

Posted on by
6

“Love thy neighbor” is preached from many a pulpit. But new research from the University of California, Berkeley, suggests that the highly religious are less motivated by compassion when helping a stranger than are atheists, agnostics and less religious people.

[…]

In the study, the link between compassion and generosity was found to be stronger for those who identified as being non-religious or less religious.

“Overall, we find that for less religious people, the strength of their emotional connection to another person is critical to whether they will help that person or not,” said UC Berkeley social psychologist Robb Willer, a co-author of the study. “The more religious, on the other hand, may ground their generosity less in emotion, and more in other factors such as doctrine, a communal identity, or reputational concerns.”

[…]

“Overall, this research suggests that although less religious people tend to be less trusted in the U.S., when feeling compassionate, they may actually be more inclined to help their fellow citizens than more religious people,” Willer said.

Read more . . .