Tag Archives: richard dawkins
INTELLECTUALISM: “Books & Happiness” / Richard Dawkins Foundation
RELIGIOUS DECEPTION: “Religious Iceberg”
ATHEISM: “In Good Company”
ATHEISM: “Atheist Temples”
EMPATHY: Richard Dawkins / “You Don’t Need Religion to Have Morals”
SCIENCE: Dawkinsia / “Sri Lankans Name New Type of Fish After Richard Dawkins”
Sri Lankan scientists have identified a new genus of fresh water fish and named it after the evolutionary biologist and renowned atheist Richard Dawkins.
[…]
Pethiyagoda, an ichthyologist and internationally acclaimed conservationist, said extensive studies in India and Sri Lanka showed that the level of diversity among such fish was “much greater than previously suspected”.
This was partly the reason that the study group had chosen to name the new genus after the 71-year-old Dawkins, the British author of the anti-religion polemic, The God Delusion.
“Richard Dawkins has through his writings helped us understand that the universe is far more beautiful and awe-inspiring than any religion has imagined[.]”
ASTROPHYSICS / PHILOSOPHY: Neil deGrasse Tyson / “A Fascinatingly Disturbing Thought”
h/t: Planet Atheism
h/t: Our Daily Train
Richard Dawkins: Education Is The Only Antidote To Religion
Richard Dawkins believes that education is the only ‘antidote’ to religion. “We need to protect children from being indoctrinated. It goes on to the next generation and then they see that their children get indoctrinated.”
“If children are taught, however moderately, that faith is a virtue, they are taught that they don’t need evidence to believe something; that they can believe something just because it’s their faith. . .
He believes that atheism will soon become a more popular framework for people. “There seems to be a correlation with education. It’s certainly true within the US — the more educated people are more likely to give up religion.”
Quote: Richard Dawkins
Clinton Richard Dawkins, Ph.D., (born 26 March 1941)
Ethologist, Evolutionary Biologist, Author, and Outspoken Atheist
Personal opinion, which is not informed by evidence, is not of interest.







